<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg Says &#8220;You Are a Zero No More&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brentcsutoras.com/2008/01/22/digg-says-you-are-a-zero-no-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brentcsutoras.com/2008/01/22/digg-says-you-are-a-zero-no-more/</link>
	<description>Social Media, Online Marketing, &#38; SEO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:52:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Masked Bandit</title>
		<link>http://www.brentcsutoras.com/2008/01/22/digg-says-you-are-a-zero-no-more/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Masked Bandit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brentcsutoras.com/2008/01/22/digg-says-you-are-a-zero-no-more/#comment-278</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a good thing that they lost the zero.

The future of Digg is an interesting question.  Digg has developed a definite collective editorial voice:  that&#039;s a good thing,  but it limits the appeal of Digg.  If you can deal with endless top ten lists and a place where Ron Paul has 20 times as many friends of any mainstream Republican,  Digg is great.  People who don&#039;t dig that (probably most people) are going to spend time with another community -- in the big picture that&#039;s OK,  but Digg would certainly like to get bigger and maximize it&#039;s network effects/first mover advantage...

Efforts to &quot;democratize&quot; Digg and take power away from the cabals that rule the front page might broaden the appeal of Digg,  but might also wreck what makes it so special.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a good thing that they lost the zero.</p>
<p>The future of Digg is an interesting question.  Digg has developed a definite collective editorial voice:  that&#8217;s a good thing,  but it limits the appeal of Digg.  If you can deal with endless top ten lists and a place where Ron Paul has 20 times as many friends of any mainstream Republican,  Digg is great.  People who don&#8217;t dig that (probably most people) are going to spend time with another community &#8212; in the big picture that&#8217;s OK,  but Digg would certainly like to get bigger and maximize it&#8217;s network effects/first mover advantage&#8230;</p>
<p>Efforts to &#8220;democratize&#8221; Digg and take power away from the cabals that rule the front page might broaden the appeal of Digg,  but might also wreck what makes it so special.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
